ECUMENIC PLURALISM

The holism so precious to the postmodern mind is by no means intended to eliminate particularity and individuality. Post-modernity seeks a dynamic whole, a cooperative whole, a synthetic whole. The dynamism of the whole contributes to the vitality of the parts just as the parts constitute the substance of the whole. Instead of union we think of communion. I have argued that the universality and comprehensiveness of the kingdom of God lend some theological support for employing such holistic and communal categories.

I believe it is within this framework that the issue of pluralism should be placed on the theological agenda for the medium-range future. The term pluralism has many meanings and connotations, but theological usage seeks to avoid sheer plurality or anarchy, on the one hand, and unity beyond discrimination, on the other hand. Particularity needs affirmation but not at the expense of community. In the present chapter, I will argue that an anarchic force is at work in current theology. I label it "radical pluralism." Radical pluralism is an ideological stance that tends to lose sight of the whole while advocating an inviolate plurality of parts. I will recommend that the better vision is that of "ecumenic pluralism," which affirms the unity of the human race as an article of faith even though empirical differences and divisions seem so strong.