Saturday, June 6, 2009

Valentin Inzko - What to Expect

.
Valentin Inzko caps his career with a difficult posting as the UN and EU's representative in Bosnia.
At the Austrian ambassador's residence in Ljubljana there was jubilation. The ambassador to Slovenia had just been appointed the new high representative of the international community in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Washington, which would have preferred a “tough Brit”, had capitulated: Valentin Inzko was the man, the seventh and probably last high representative (HR). The champagne flowed, as did the congratulations reaching the ambassador's mobile phone. “Habemus papam” read a text message from the Czech ambassador in Sarajevo; a “mucha suerte” came from Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief.
By happy coincidence, news of the decision arrived during a reception in Ljubljana for Michael Spindelegger, the visiting foreign minister of Austria, who made a speech about recognition for Austrian diplomacy, of the country's key role in the Balkans and so on.

But everyone in the room, Inzko most of all, was painfully aware that Bosnia's three ethnic groups – Serb, Croat, and Bosniak (Muslim) – are hopelessly log-jammed, rumoured (probably falsely) to be re-arming and that there is bad blood between the US and the EU over Bosnia. In short, that running the office of the HR, guardian of the cobbled-together 1995 Dayton Agreement, which ended a war in which 100,000 died, is difficult going on impossible.

It is, says veteran Balkan-watcher Paul Lendvai, the closest that diplomacy gets to kamikaze aviation.

Inzko said that he accepted the job, which involves doubling up as the EU's special representative, “with great joy, but with the sense of a heavy burden”. One wonders about the joy. Until his appoint-ment, Inzko, who turns 60 this month, was leading a comfortable life in what might easily have been a cushy last post-ing. “He has original ideas for what can be achieved in Bosnia, but he is not pers-onally ambitious,” observes a close friend.

Leaving the Slovene capital will certainly be a wrench. It is pretty, peaceful and for the Slovene-Austrian Inzko, utterly familiar, as it is for his wife, the world-famous opera diva Bernarda Fink, and for their two teenage children.

Any bilateral awkwardness at the embassy between Austria and Slovenia has been slight and predictable, usually to do with Carinthia, the Austrian region bordering Slovenia where Inzko was born into a cultured, conservative Slovene-Austrian family.

This was the fiefdom of the notorious populist Jörg Haider – until his demise in a drunken car-smash last October – who owed much of his success to anti-Slovene campaigns. One was against street-signs in Slovenian as well as German. The rabid ‘Carinthia goes monolingual!' campaign provoked Inzko to withdraw his permission to Haider to address him by the informal ‘du'.

He identifies strongly with Carinthia's Slovenian-speaking, mostly Catholic, minority. They owe much of their cultural autonomy to the liberation of 1945 and the executive decrees of the Allies. Inzko is aware of the parallels with Bosnia and his background has proved useful preparation for a diplomatic career in the region.

He now knows two generations of the political players in the Balkans, and all their languages (he speaks seven in all). When he says his return to Sarajevo is a homecoming, it is more than a diplomatic politesse. In 1996 he was the first Austrian ambassador in the city after the Serb liberation war. The window frames in the apartment block where he first lived had no glass.

Inzko did a lot for the city, which made him an honorary citizen. Some weekends he got away, as he still does now, to hear Bernarda perform in New York or Milan or the Grand Théâtre de Genève, where she first made her name as a mezzo-soprano and which is the city where they met in the 1980s.

Inzko's immediate predecessor as HR, the Slovak Miroslav Lajc?ák, made the mistake of staying on after being fatally undermined (notably by Solana). Lajc?ák openly attacked the international community's capitulation to local leaders, notably Milorad Dodik, the prime minister of Republika Srpska, comprising about half the country. Dodik had threatened to “wrestle with NATO tanks” if the HR used its executive powers against him.

Such is everyday politics in Bosnia, where the powerful external actors are the US, Russia and the EU – mostly in that order. The EU's only real leverage over the country is the prospect of EU membership – however unlikely it is any time soon. But even if the aspiration is now a routine item on the country's agenda, membership worries political actors. It would make it harder for the Serbs to break away one day, à la Montenegro, for instance. And Bosniak leaders fear EU membership would simply cement Serbian autonomy in place indefinitely.

The US matters a lot more than Europe. Washington is increasingly impatient with a European approach to Bosnia that it regards as unserious.

One of the causes of delay in deciding on Inzko's appointment was delay in establishing the team of US President Barack Obama. But Washington's reticence hardly strengthens Inzko's hand. Nor does talk of appointing a special US Balkans envoy.

As for the EU, it is busy proving the accuracy of US allegations of its incompetence. There is no consensus among member states about whether Inzko should be allowed to stay on after his contract as EU special representative formally ends next February. Others are already jostling for the EU position, which, it was announced last autumn, would be “reinforced” after the office of the high representative is closed down. So far Solana has failed to explain how it might be strengthened.

Not, evidently, by troops. In 1995 there were 60,000 peacekeepers in Bosnia. There are now 2,000 bored and disaffected Eufor men and women: troop levels are scheduled to shrink further in the next months, down to as few as 200.

Inzko is expected to be, if not a kamikaze, then a test-pilot in a hazardous experiment in soft power. The best he can hope for is a soft landing.
From our side we need to carefully balance between all this players and look for strong open support from Russia and not so open support from US and EU.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Russian-Israeli relations are at their best ever,

.
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has said after a meeting with his Russian counterpart. But the main focus of the meeting was the Middle East peace process.

This is Lieberman’s first visit to Russia after taking office at the end of March.

Apart from bilateral ties, the ministers have also discussed such issues as the Middle East peace process and Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Read more

Both Russia and Israel have spoken out on their diplomatic concerns in the Middle East.

Lieberman said he was very disappointed over Sergey Lavrov’s recent meeting with Hamas leader Khaled Mashal in Syria, but Russia insists that ignoring Hamas is not going to help move the talks forward.

Lavrov said it was essential that Middle East Quartet negotiations should continue.

Lieberman acknowledged that it would take the efforts of all interested parties to resume talks, though added that his hopes are to build ties with the Arab world.

Russia was also asked about its arms trade in the region and whether it is something that Israel should be concerned about.

“Russia doesn’t sell any weapons through intermediaries. Our military cooperation with the west is strictly in accordance with domestic laws and international regulations. As for arms supplies to the Middle East, our main role is to prevent destabilization and preserve the existing balance of forces,” Sergey Lavrov responded.

As for Iran, Israel would want Russia to press the country into stopping its nuclear work. Israel is worried that Iran is developing an atomic weapon under the guise of a peaceful nuclear program.

Russia, on the other hand, is helping Iran to build its first atomic power plant.

That is the issue on which Russia and Israel do not quite see eye to eye, though Sergey Lavrov did stress that it is absolutely necessary to make sure that Iran’s nuclear program is indeed peaceful.

Israel’s relationship with the new US administration was also discussed.

“The US, just like any other state in the world, protects its interests, including in the Middle East. In our case both the US and Israel share a common approach and democratic interests based on human and cultural principles. This collaboration is simply natural,” Lieberman said.

The two also discussed such issues as cultural exchanges and holding a ‘Year of Russia in Israel’.

The sides have agreed to pool efforts against the falsification of history and also to celebrate the 65th anniversary of victory in World War II.

"We discussed such a complex and important theme as joint counteraction to attempts to falsify history, bearing in mind the attempts to deny the tragedy of the Holocaust, to obliterate the memory of those who freed Europe from fascism, and to glorify accomplices to Nazi rule," Sergei Lavrov told a news conference after the talks. "We are determined to counteract neo-Nazism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia, and agreed to prepare joint events in the run-up to the 65th anniversary of the victory to be marked in 2010."

The ministers decided to prepare a meeting of the intergovernmental commission on trade and economic cooperation, which would boost cooperation in state-of-the-art technologies and innovation projects.

On Tuesday, Avigdor Lieberman confirmed Israel’s readiness to participate in the preparation and staging of a Middle East Conference in Moscow, planned for late summer or autumn.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Boris Tadić

Boris Tadić (Serbian: Борис Тадић; born January 15, 1958 in Sarajevo) is a Serbian politician and the current President of Serbia. A psychologist by profession, he is a leader ofthe Democratic Party. Tadić was elected to a five-year term on June 27, 2004, and was sworn into office on July 11, 2004. He was reelected for a de facto[1] second five-year term on February 3, 2008 and was sworn in on February 15. Prior to Presidency, Tadić served as the Minister of Telecommunications of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and as the Minister of Defence of Serbia and Montenegro.

Boris Tadić advocates full integration of Serbia into the European Union but he also believes Serbia can only join the EU if territorial integrity of Serbia with sovereignty over Kosovo and Metohija is respected.[2] He is seen as a pro-Western leader but who favors well-balanced relations with Russia, the United States, and the EU.[3][4][5